What animal do you associate yourself with? What animal do you associate yourself with? Gemini - dune cat

The animal world lives by strict rules. The stronger eat the weak, the reproductive instincts and survival instincts take over and only the strongest always wins. Unlike animals, nature gave man a soul, the ability to compassion and pity, although sometimes animals have a more open heart when it comes to children or the sick than some people. The animal world is clearly divided into flocks, as well as people into "castes". But animals do not exterminate themselves, as a person does during a constant desire to develop and develop "civilization" and receive more and more "benefits" to save their time and energy.

Interesting is the fact that the main features of the character and behavior in animals and humans are identical. Among the representatives of "intelligent" beings there are also eternal "predators" and eternal "victims". The stronger "eat" the weak and defenseless. Only those who could heartlessly step over others and become the leader of the “pack” rise to the top.

To understand what kind of animal you are, or rather, the character traits and behaviors of which animal are similar to yours, read the description and find yourself among the "powerful ones", and then, perhaps, you will be able to answer some personal questions that torment you, but that you don't want to say out loud. The answers are very often on the surface, it's just that a person is used to looking for a "double bottom" in the elementary.

Wolf

The wolf is a predator that constantly goes to its goal. He takes care of his family, not thinking about the feelings and opinions of "strangers". The wolf is cruel in the case of protecting his own. He will not look for ways to get closer to strangers, because everything alien is always a threat. The wolf is always secretive and rarely opens his heart to anyone. This predator only comes when it wants or sees fit to reward someone with its presence. It's useless to call him. He is not emotional, so it is sometimes difficult to withstand his "painful" restraint and "unemotionlessness". If suddenly you are on the list of the Wolf's enemies, then you just have to enjoy every moment of life as if it were the last, because Wolves do not forgive insults.

Wolves are most often: Capricorns, Aries, Sagittarius, Aquarius, Cancers.

a lion

Big cat. Proud and majestic. The physical form of the Lion is always excellent, the males are always large and strong. Lions around the clock ready for exploits. They are eager to fight in order to always be on top. They do not know how to lose, lions are eternal winners. This animal is a born leader and leader. Leo knows that he is strong, and therefore does not understand the meaning of the words "loss", "fatigue", "concessions", "compromise". Leos do nothing just for the sake of a whim or pleasure, they live for the sake of "satisfying hunger", not offending anyone for the sake of ordinary self-satisfaction. Leos love luxury and wealth. They are used to getting aesthetic pleasure from everything that surrounds them. Kings are always kind to their slaves. And the lion has always been and always will be king.

Lions are most often: Lions (sorry for the tautology), Scorpios, Capricorns.

Dog

The dog is a sincere and reliable friend, an intelligent interlocutor and a devoted protector. This animal is characterized by a heightened sense of justice in personal and work matters. The main "talent" of the dog is their ability to listen carefully and understand what the interlocutor needs from them. The dog does not like to be the center of attention, but he always appears at the right moment. Such is a kind of friend - Superman (a).

Dogs are most often: Taurus, Virgo, Libra, Pisces.

Fox

The fox is always kind to others on the outside, but very insidious inside. Representatives of this species of animals are found on all continents, in all countries, in every city. Her color is always bright, her appearance is attractive and luxurious. For its own benefit, the fox can dissemble, blackmail, “pocket” and take away, but she does all this beautifully, unobtrusively and without any trace of her “crime”. To be a fox means to fall in love with everyone. She is a real woman by nature: beautiful, cunning and sometimes deadly.

Foxes are most often: Gemini, Scorpio, Pisces, Libra.

Cat

A domestic and needy creature. Sometimes "purring" with pleasure, and sometimes showing claws. They do not like separation and prefer the eternal campaign of warm and dear people. The main feature of this beauty is elevated level egocentrism. Not getting enough warmth and attention, she can become depressed. If you have done something wrong in front of the Cat, then do not even dream that you will get away with this. Revenge will catch up with you.

If the Cat is in a bad mood, then you will immediately understand this. In this case, the main rule is to please and amuse. Only 100% attention and the manifestation of love can save the situation.

Cats are most often: Pisces, Virgo, Libra.

Horse

Stately, beautiful and cheerful animal. The horse always knows what is in fashion, which "field" has the most delicious grass, how to attract attention in a large crowd, and who she really needs in her life. The perfect combination of intelligence and beauty. The horse rarely admits his mistakes, repents of his sins. She will blame the circumstances and the people around her, but she will never admit she was wrong. Horses are in constant motion, they need dynamics and speed. A partner is a prerequisite for their happy life. The horse loves to live with a backup plan for a rainy day.

Horses are most often: Gemini, Pisces, Libra.

Which animal is closest in character to you? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Marina Poznyakova

Imagine the situation: you are looking for a job, looking for a great vacancy for yourself, carefully preparing for an interview, thinking through all the most intricate and tricky questions, coming to a meeting with a potential employer ... and suddenly you hear a question: “ What animal do you associate yourself with?»

Most often, it is at this point that the average person collapses. What animals? Am I here to settle down in the zoo? What do they want from me? Is this guy crazy? What kind of crazy questions?!

And, by the way, there is nothing delusional in this matter. Psychologists say that this is just a dream, not a question: it allows the manager to evaluate the creativity of the vacancy applicant, his stress resistance, reaction speed, ingenuity and, of course, the main personal qualities - depending on the representative of the fauna, which he will name.

So, for example, people who associate themselves with giraffes are individuals with a well-developed sense of beauty. They are aesthetes, they take care of their own appearance, so, let's say, an office manager or a consultant - the position is just for them.

Giraffe people are elegant in everything from hairstyles to communication with clients. They learn new things easily, interact well with other team members, strive for great accomplishments - just like giraffes reach for fruits hanging on trees above.

Such characters, of course, also have disadvantages, such as excessive slowness developing from elegant regularity, or a direct result of the desire for great unwillingness to do routine work, but an experienced leader can easily cope with them, forcing positive qualities to completely block the negative.

Many people associate themselves with bears - just like in those stereotypical stories about Russian Ivan with a bear, vodka and a balalaika. Here, too, everything is eloquent: in the pluses there is strength, pressure and the ability to get out of the most difficult situations (a direct analogy with a bear forced to suck its paw with hunger in winter), in the minuses - a certain limitation, stubbornness, straightforwardness. Well, cruelty - especially if these guys take away a pot of honey :)

"Bears" are recommended to be carefully pushed against clients - sometimes their impulsiveness can interfere with productive work. However, if you need to fulfill the sales plan, and the “giraffes” are stalling, the “clubfoot” will come in handy.

Some people consider the cow as their totem animal. They are characterized by calmness, bordering on phlegmatism, kindness, sometimes causing outright connivance, attentiveness, which can easily be confused with meticulousness.

These people are not suitable leadership positions, and, even if so, they will be uncomfortable and hard on them. A dull “Moo”, to be honest, motivates you to work much worse than “Wow-wow-wow!” or even "Crow!"

As you can see, your answer to the question of what animal you associate yourself with can give the boss a lot of information about you. Think over the answer to it, because everyone knows that the best improvisation is prepared improvisation. Sometimes you can embellish the situation: for example, if you consider yourself somehow connected with a skunk or a platypus since childhood, then it is better to keep silent about this at the interview.

P.S. Personally, the elephant is closest to me mentally, as you may have already understood: a confident, powerful animal, moderately kind, but at the same time demolishing everything on its way to success. How about your associations?

The method of free associations is actively used in psychoanalysis. The essence of the method is that a person unconsciously gives an associative link to a stimulus word with those words that describe his problem.

This test, like all association tests, is used to identify a person's personality traits. Your answers to the test questions determine your values ​​and ideals, your attitude towards yourself, others and life in general.

The psychological test "Associations" is a determinant of your attitude to family, money, loved ones and life in general. It can be called a joke, but it is still largely truthful, especially if you answer questions honestly and do not think for a long time.

You will need a pen, pencil, and paper to take the test. Your task is to answer the questions without looking at the lines below, otherwise you will not get the desired result. Answer the questions in detail, state your thoughts in as much detail as possible. You can complete your answers with a picture.

You should not give yourself much time to think: the first association is the most correct one. Write down the very first thing that comes to mind, and then decipher the meaning of what you wrote down and find out what is hidden in your subconscious.

Exercise 1.

Describe (in a few sentences) what associations evoke in you:

• Coffee.
• Dog.
• Cat.
• Sea.
• Rat.

Task 2.

Arrange the animals according to your attitude towards them (starting with the ones you like best):

• Pig.
• Cow.
• Horse.
• Tiger.
• Sheep.

Task 3.

Think of 5 people you often think about and choose a color for each of them:

• Red.
• Yellow.
• Green.
• White.
• Orange.

Exercise 1.

Associations with coffee reflect your interest in sex.

Do you think you are writing about dog but really think about yourself.

Description cats corresponds to the idea of ​​​​your partner.

Sea reflects your perceptions of others.

Rat- Your enemy.

Task 2.

You have set your life priorities, because each animal in the subconscious mind is associated with a specific subject or concept. Sheep means love, pig- money, cow- career tiger- dignity and honor horse- a family.

Task 3.

The person to whom you assigned the color red is the one you sincerely love.

Yellow refers to someone you will not forget throughout your life, even if you really want to.

The person to whom the green color is assigned is your true friend.

Orange characterizes the one whom you yourself consider the best friend.

White is the color of a person close to you in spirit.

Think about the test results. Are you satisfied with everything? Maybe something should be changed? Let your subconscious mind come up with solutions, don't interfere with this process with your mental reflections.

Consider the test results only as information for reflection, as starting points that you should pay attention to when choosing a further strategy. Psychologist Online will help you correctly use the test results, help you navigate the structure of accents and correct your psychological state.

Want to get a more accurate interpretation of the test? Save your entries and .

Theoretical justifications for data interpretation

We reveal an even deeper layer of attitudes towards politics with the help of association method . Unlike the method of free associations, which is traditionally used in psychology, we work with fixed associations - associations with animals, associations with color and smell, which allows us to compare politicians with each other.

The interpretation of the obtained associations of the image of this or that politician with an animal, color and smell required the development of theoretical foundations for identifying the meanings of the obtained associations.

So, in associations with animals, we proceeded from the fact that only those associations that are associated with the metaphorical images of a given culture are subject to interpretation. Hence, for example, such animals that are exotic for a given culture (rhinos, panthers, giraffes, platypuses, etc.) were interpreted as evidence of the inorganic nature of this politician to the dominant political culture (not from our forest).

We analyzed these associations on the basis of the general interpretation scheme proposed by M.V. Novikova - Grund. So, first of all, we identified the metaphorical meanings of this or that animal in the context of the national folklore series. The schema looks like this:

1) "The mythological circle of animals" unites the protagonists of proverbs, fairy tales, signs. Animals of this circle are inscribed in the plot, have their own constants, repeating from paroemia to paroemia roles, attributes, and locus- "locus of action", in the plot they interact with other characters, also endowed with fixed roles. The most developed and productive plots and the roles fixed in them do not differ in great structural diversity and fall into several groups:

RELATIONSHIP OPPONENT / OPPONENT

Rivalry for superiority in the locus (bear/wolf);

Rivalry in the hunt for prey (bear/wolf/fox...)

In these relations, the following roles were revealed: the invariant LORD and the WINNER - a bear in the "non-human locus" (in the "human locus" the person himself acts as such, and in the "man-bear" plot, both outcomes of rivalry are possible); -strong (equal, intelligent) RIVAL (wolf, fox, boar...);

RELATIONSHIPS HUNTER / VICTIMS (man / wolf; wolf / hare ...) In these relations, the roles were revealed: - "HUNTER CATCHING" (dog, wolf); "HUNTER AMBURSHED" (cat, lynx); "THE HUNTER WHO COMPENSATES THE LACK OF STRENGTH AND AGGRESSION WITH CLEANITY AND INTELLIGENCE" (man, fox); - STRONG and WEAK VICTIMS; and the role of "MAXIMUM WEAK VICTIMS" - "FOOD" turned out to be especially interesting. "SACRIFICE-FOOD" (turkey, rooster) simultaneously participate in the plot "false ruler", "master of the weak", being an inverse, caricature image of a character who imagines himself to be the LORD, but is simply "FOOD" for the true LORD.

RELATIONSHIP LORD/SERVANT Here the roles of the FAITHFUL SERVANT (dog) came to light; A DANGEROUS SERVANT, who at the same time turns out to be a MAGIC ASSISTANT (horse, wolf); EVIL SERVANT (cat); a special place among the SERVANTS is occupied by a pig - it serves only nominally, does not know duty, gratitude, is dirty, omnivorous and insatiable; however, she is a "MAGIC ASSISTANT", bringing "wealth", which she herself does not have and does not need. This role can be called the SERVANT-TALISMAN.

RELATIONSHIPS PROPERTY GUARDIAN / PILLAR (dog / "strangers"; hamster / "destroyers of holes"). It is easy to see that the plots and roles cited here in one way or another interpret the dominance-submission relations - i.e. the same relationships that are of primary interest for this study. This fact, apparently, requires a special explanation, since the idea to include associations with animals in the survey belonged to a psychologist who did not foresee the possibility of decoding a series through plot-role relations in mythological discourse. From the point of view of a linguist, we have an indirect confirmation of the hypothesis: on a rational level, the psychologist intended to evaluate the results on the scales "size", "degree of aggressiveness", "activity", but on an irrational level, he turned, like the respondents, to the common for all native speakers of the Russian language folklore-mythological discourse, in which most of the plots describe the relationship of dominance, subordination and power.

In addition to "mythological" images, the answers of respondents often repeat images of animals that do not correlate with folklore and mythological discourse. These images almost do not participate in productive plots, but they have a fairly specific list of attributes motivated by phraseological turns of the Russian language:

THICK-Skinned AS (elephant, rhinoceros, hippopotamus, etc.);

UGLY (FUNNY, SMART) like a monkey (see THESAURUS for details);

FAST AS (doe, deer, cheetah, hound...);

ANCIENT AS (brontosaurus, pterodactyl...);

HAIR HAIR LIKE (hedgehog, porcupine).

The answers of the respondents often mention not adult animals, but cubs. We considered it acceptable to interpret this as a confirmation of all the attributes of the image and a non-confirmation of dominant roles, for example: "bear cub" retains all the attributes of a bear (smart, rude, clumsy, inhospitable), but does not retain the role (not LORD); at the same time, the "piglet" fully retains all the characteristics of the "pig", since the role (SERVANT-TALISMAN) is not dominant.

In conclusion, consider the THESAURUS OF ZOOLOGICAL METAPHORS, ranked according to the degree of favorableness:

positive associations

1. "The bear and the circle of animals - strong RIVALS / HUNTERS, duplicating its qualities: wolf, fox, lion, bull, elk..." rival." His attributes: "rude, angry, hungry, smart, clumsy..." This association is probably the most favorable for a candidate for the presidency. In the analyzed material, the "bears" are Yeltsin (8), Chernomyrdin (4), Lebed (4), Gaidar (2) (but Gaidar does not have the necessary quality of "calm-confident").

2. "Horse" - with the mythological plot sign "magic helper". This is not a very good association for the applicant, since the "horse" must have a "master", but there are such important attributes as "unexpected self-will" and "knowledge of fate".

3. "Dog" duplicates the mythological plot of the "horse", but without mystical attributes - a non-winning association.

Negative associations:

4. "Cat" - "thievish voluptuary".

5. "Rat", "hamster-badger" - "greedy and cautious guardian of his own hole and property."

Sharply negative association:

6. "Turkey-peacock" - "false ruler-food", a caricature opposition to the "bear".

Ambivalent association:

7. "Pig" - "servant-talisman", dirty, fat, knows how to lead to wealth, dreams of power and nobility inaccessible by the will of God. "This metaphor combines: a) disgusting external, psychological and ethical characteristics (note that the owner of the Pig - the Man with whom the respondents implicitly associate themselves - has the same psychological and ethical characteristics: greedy, ungrateful, dodgy); b) mysterious knowledge; c) neglect or "pig" inability to appreciate the wealth desired by the Man; d) "idealistic" dreams of the inaccessible; e) contact, albeit of a negative nature, with God, which limits the possibilities of the Pig to the "earthly, dirty" sphere. In the analyzed material, associations with the "Pig" are found in the perception of Gaidar, Zyuganov, Yeltsin.

The perfect combination of metaphors: "Bear-Wolf-Horse" with the dominance of "Bear". Worst combination: Hamster-turkey.

In the political-psychological part of the study, we chose the following parameters for interpreting associations with animals:

attraction ( both external and moral) based on the attributions to this animal that exist in our culture. So, for example, a pig is unpleasant, and a pig is wow. The horse is attractive, but the snake is not pretty. This dimension of unconscious evaluations allows us to compare the level of attractiveness on a rational level with unconscious reactions to the same politician.

aggressiveness(we determined this characteristic by the herbivorous or predatory nature of the animal). Aggressiveness at the unconscious level, in our opinion, characterizes the level of activity comparable to that at the rational level.

Strength is just as important on the unconscious level as it is on the rational level. However, in addition to the actual parameter of strength in associations with animals, we singled out the size of the animal, which we interpret as a certain reflection of the scale of the individual. If until 1999 all the data that we received on Russian politicians testified to a correlation between the choice of a particular politician and an assessment of his image as a big or at least average, then with the appearance on the political scene of V.V. Putin. this clear picture is confused: animals of modest scale predominate in his image. Possibly, in order to evaluate this type of leader, the respondents use a changed model of perception: in the new century, Russian voters are no longer looking for a charismatic leader, they are more attracted to “one like us.” This is just a hypothesis. In the future, we will have to look for an adequate interpretation of this picture.

6.3.2. A associations with color.

The initial hypotheses from which we proceeded in the interpretation of color associations were the following:

The sensations that a person receives from the external environment have shaped the character and behavior of a person for thousands of years.

The impact of the environment causes a person to have various sensations - visual, olfactory, tactile. Their constant impact on the unconscious created strong associations of these sensations with certain concepts, and in the course of evolution these associations were genetically fixed in the collective unconscious.

Thus,

* sensations and perceptions are connected not only with the stimulus. But also among themselves (color - with a smell)

* There is a connection between sensations (perceptions) and the type of behavior

* It means. that associations with one or another object can be used to interpret not only the type of behavior of the recipient, but also be attributed to the object (in our case, the politician)

Color has 3 physical properties:

1. Color tone - a certain wavelength within a certain part of the spectrum. Pure colors - red, yellow. Green, blue. The rest are mixed.

2. Brightness or lightness - the intensity of the radiation in comparison with others.

3. Saturation or purity (the amount of achromatic (white, black, gray) mixed with the main color. All natural colors have this admixture.

The human eye under certain conditions can distinguish from 20,000 to 2,000,000 colors. Artist - up to a million shades. However, there are no such symbols in the language. Even shades of primary colors are descriptive - orange from orange. Yellow - from bile. Complementary colors generally do not have their own names (raspberry, lettuce, brick) or descriptive character (dark green).

For our study, the problem of the psychological impact of the color spectrum is important, or rather verbal attribution of color associations and their interpretation, more than the actual problem of color perception.

The psychological effect of color is twofold: primary, thanks to which we perceive an environment or an object and get some kind of impression (heaviness, heat, humidity, etc.) and secondary, subconscious, acting through associations. The latter is more individual and accumulates through the acquisition of experience.

However, there are a number of associations of an objective nature. They came from the depths of centuries and entrenched in the unconscious of a person and are transmitted genetically from generation to generation. For example, the connection of orange with the sun, warmth, energy, blue and blue with the sea, sky, peace. It left its mark on the culture. We have a bad idea of ​​calm red, dry - blue-green. And air - brown.

Color is poorly defined in a situation of unstable consciousness: fear, anxiety, pain, feeling unwell. IN In our study, it is worth paying attention to respondents who cannot give color associations.

Darkness is associated with black and dark blue colors. This associative connection entered the collective unconscious. These colors evoke feelings of fear, insecurity, and depression. Bright and light colors, on the contrary, either amuse, especially those close to the sun - orange and yellow, or soothe - green, blue.

Light shades evoke feelings of security and a surge of strength, action, joy.

Darkness is a dangerous time, a feeling of anxiety, uncertainty, mystery. This is a direct guide to interpreting color associations with politicians. Most of which (especially successful ones) are associated in consciousness with dark tones. They cause either fear and anxiety, or seem mysterious. It is also necessary to explain why the brightest and brightest of politicians are so inefficient in getting the desired posts.

Achromatic tones are non-emotional. These are the abstract colors of time and space.

The red-yellow part of the spectrum causes a feeling of warmth. Blue-blue - cold. Maximum heat is caused by orange, not red. This is purely psychological, not physical. Since the wavelength of red is longer than that of orange.

Red is perceived as the most active. Exciting. Violet - Calm is growing. Orange-yellow causes a feeling of joy, a decrease in aggressiveness and activity.

Green - balance. Combines the lightness and liveliness of yellow with the calmness and heaviness of blue. Active colors are better remembered and seem more vivid.

The greatest sense of distance from the subject (that is, an increase in space) is created by the colors of the blue-blue part of the spectrum. Time slows down.

Orange-yellow give the effect of approaching the observer. Time is accelerating. Blue-blue shades are heavy, yellow are light.

Blue-blue colors are not sexy. Sexuality builds up through purple to red.

Bright and light (warm) colors are exciting, stimulating to communicate, to work. Cold colors cause inhibition, rationality, rationality.

Green, green-yellow, olive-balancing, immersing in the inner world.

Pastel colors (pink, salad, lilac) - modesty. Tenderness. Weasel.

Black and others dark colors- darkness. gloom, melancholy, fear.

Pair - blue-yellow - tension, movement.

Red-yellow - impulsiveness. Life affirmation.

Violet-yellow-green - hidden power, balanced.

Orange-blue - torn energy combined with isolation.

Associations with color in the book will be analyzed in detail in relation to each policy separately. If we try to interpret the data obtained by comparing politicians with each other, then the following trends are revealed. Associations with color were divided by us into the following formal categories: light-dark, warm-cold, and bright-dim. Almost all effective Russian politicians are seen in a dark, cold and dull range of colors. Exceptions are "bright" personalities: Gaidar, Skokov, Yavlinsky and S. Fedorov. Predominantly warm tones distinguish only one politician - Gaidar. The general picture of the perception of politicians in color turned out to be gloomy, causing a feeling unattractiveness politicians, their alienation from the respondents. It is rather a collective image of power as such, which is perceived extremely negatively at an unconscious level. The same exceptions that evoke “warm” and “bright” feelings clearly do not look like the favorites of the political struggle and do not cause a desire to move from emotional acceptance to electoral behavior.